Dual Space

Let be a vector space. We define the dual space of by

We call elements of 1-covectors on .

We assume that is finite-dimensional with basis , i.e., for all there is a unique linear combination with . Define by

Prp

The functions form a basis for .

Proof: We need to show they span and are linearly independent. Let and . Notice that

So

Thus, spans . Next let such that

Then it follows that

for all . Therefore, .

Q.E.D.

Cor

The dual space has the same dimension as .

Permutations

A permutation of a set is a bijection . It is common to visualize permutations as matrices. For example, the permutation

maps , , , and .

The product of two permutations and of is the permutation given by composition. The cyclic permutation, , where each is distinct, is the permutation such that , , …, and . Any permutation can be written as a product of disjoint transpositions. For example,

We define to be the group of all permutations on the set with the group operation defined by composition. A permutation is either even or odd depending on the number of transpositions in ‘s decomposition. We define the sign of as +1 if it is even, or -1 if it is odd. One may show that

for all .

An inversion in a permutation is an ordered pair such that but . For example, the permutation

has inversions , , , and .

Prp

A permutation is even if and only if it has an even number of inversions.

Multilinear Functions

A function is -linear if it linear in each of its arguments:

A -linear function is also called a **-tensor.

Example: With respect to the standard basis for , the dot product

is bilinear.

Def

A -linear function is symmetric if

for all permutations ; it is alternating if

We define the space to be all alternating -linear functions on a vector space . We call such functions alternating k-tensors or -covectors.

The Permutation Action on Multilinear Functions

If is a group and is a set, the map defined by

is called a left action of on if

  1. for all
  2. for all and . A right action of on is defined similarily.

The orbit of an element is the set

As we saw in the definition above, we can define a group action on -linear functions by by defining

Thus, is symmetric if and only if and alternating if and only if .

In the case , is the trivial group and all 1-linear functions are both symmetric and alternating.

Lemma

If and is a -linear function on , then .

Proof: Notice that

Q.E.D.

The Symmetrizing and Alternating Operators

From any -linear function on a vector space , we can construct a symmetric -linear function by adding all possible permutations:

Indeed, notice that for any ,

Similarly, we can construct an alternating -linear function

Notice that for any ,

Lemma

If is an alternating -linear function on a vector space , then .

Proof: Notice that and . Thus,

Q.E.D.

The Tensor Product

Let be a -linear function and an -linear function. Then their tensor product is the -linear function defined by

Example: Let be the basis for and the basis for and a bilinear map. So for and we get that

Hence .

Prp

The tensor product is associative:

Proof: Let be -linear, be -linear and be -linear. Notice that

Q.E.D.

The Wedge Product

Let be an alternating -linear function and be an alternating -linear function. The wedge product or exterior product is the alternating -linear function

i.e.,

Example: For and ,

Since is alternating and so on. So

To avoid duplicate terms in the sum, one may only consider -shuffles where

This reduces the wedge product to a sum of terms instead of , i.e.,

Example: If and are 1-covectors on , then

Example: For ,

Anticommutativity of the Wedge Product

Prp

The wedge prouct is anticommuatative: if and , then

Proof: Define by

Notice that

and

Thus,

Dividing by gives

and .

Q.E.D.

Cor

If is a multicovector of odd degree on , then .

Proof: Let be -linear where is odd. Then

Therefore, .

Q.E.D.

Associativity of the Wedge Product

Prp

Let be a real vector space and alternating multilinear functions on of degrees respectively. Then

As a result, one may show that

which naturally extends to arbitrary many alternating multilinear functions ,

We denote by the matrix whose -entry is .

Prp

If are linear functions on a vector space , then

Proof: By Leibniz formula:

Q.E.D.

A Basis for -Covectors

We use the multi-index notation

and write for and for where is the basis for and is the basis for .

Lemma

Let be a basis for a vector space and its dual basis for . If and are strictly ascending multi-indices, then

Proof: Notice that

If , then is the identity matrix. Assume that and let indicate the first terms that differ, i.e.,

If , then and . As a result, . Hence, the matrix has a zero row. A similar argument holds if .

Q.E.D.

Prp

The alternating -linear functions for form a basis for the space of alternating -linear functions on .

Proof: We need to show spanning and linear independence. Assume that where the sum runs across all possible strictly ascending multi-indices . Notice then that

Thus, they are linearly independent.

Now let . We claim that

Notice that

thus and agree over the basis elements. Therefore, .

Q.E.D.

Cor

If the vector space has dimension , then has dimension .

Cor

If , then .

Problems

3.1. Tensor product of covectors

Let be a basis for a vector space and its dual basis in . Let and define the bilinear function

for and in . Describe in terms of the tensor products of and , .

Answer:

3.2. Hyperplanes

(a) Let be a vector space of dimension and a non-zero linear functional. Show that , i.e., is a hyperplane in .

Answer: By rank-nullity,

Since and is non-zero, it follows that .

(b) Show that a nonzero linear functional on a vector space is determined up to a multiplicative constant by its kernel, i.e., if are nonzero linear functionals and then for some .

Answer: Since is nonzero, there is some such that where . We may assume WLOG that , otherwise take . Notice that

implies that . Thus,

3.4. A characterization of alternating -tensors

Let be a -tensor on a vector space . Prove that is alternating if and only if changes sign whenever two successive arguments are interchanged:

for .

Answer: Let be alternating. Notice that

For the converse, let and consider the decomposition of

where each is a transposition. Notice that

Therefore, is alternating.